Aircraft Fuel Gauge Accuracy

Fuel Sensor Accuracy 

The following quoted from reference 2.

This FAR Part 91.205 fuel-gauge requirement can be seen as a corollary of a more general and more fundamental point, namely the importance of taking a layered approach to safety.

For any important task, you want to have multiple independent ways of dealing with the task, so that each way can serve as a cross-check and a backup for the other(s).

For example, the right magneto is a backup for the left magneto.  Similarly, pilots are trained to never overemphasize or underemphasize any particular instrument, but rather to scan all the instruments, cross-check them, and use all available information to build an understanding of the overall situation.

When we apply this idea to fuel, it means you should have multiple independent sources of information about the fuel quantity. 

Good sources include:

• The preflight measurement in combination with an estimate of the fuel-burn rate and the elapsed time.

• A fuel totalizer or totalizer function on the MFD.

• The fuel level gauges and by corollary the fuel level sensors

No one source should be overemphasized at the expense of the others.

Remember that having two magnetos doesn’t just make the engine twice as reliable; it makes it thousands of times more reliable.

Using gauges as a backup to a visual preflight, flight planning and totalizer makes fuel exhaustion vastly more unlikely.

CiES Inc builds accurate and reliable fuel level sensors - 

References

1.

“Pilot-In-Command Decisionmaking” (Chapter 21 of See How It Flies) http://www.av8n.com/how/htm/decision.html

2.

"Aircraft Fuel Gauge Accuracy" http://www.av8n.com/fly/fuel-gauges.htm

Aviation Fuel Level

Traditional Aircraft Fuel Sender 

Why don't my fuel gauges work?

Let us cover a few basics  

• Aviation industry has utilized level senders from other applications
• Aviation is not the largest market or the most financially rewarding for a dedicated fuel level sensing solution.

• Aircraft fuel tanks are larger than those for most other applications. 
• An aircraft carries more fuel.

• An aircraft has three degrees of motion freedom 
• The liquid fuel is free to move about.

There are other factors.

• Why not design a new system 
• Fuel Level Intellectual Property is hotly contested territory (a patent minefield) 
• A new aviation design must avoid other patents 
• The market share is small
• The perceived liability - Top 5 aircraft incident issue

• Fuel Level in Aircraft needs to be "Intrisically Safe".
• Explosion Proof 
• Limited Spark or Heat Energy in the fuel tank. 
• Non - Contact "The best solution" for Intrinsic safety is the hottest IP in Fuel Level
• Required for multi fuel and hybrid vehicles
• Required for vehicles with long term fuel storage - i.e. Boats
• Required in LNG / LPG

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Fuel sending works in my car.

• Automotive fuel tanks are smaller
• What would be adequate for a resolving 16 gallons of fuel has difficulty with 3 times the volume.   
• If you have a boat - this is also an issue as you are well aware
• The variable resistor technology used in automotive applications doesn't scale well
• The variable resistor cards used,  allow 60 degrees of travel  - a good resistive card for aircraft or boats would require minimum. 180 degrees or more.

• Relatively stable fluid motion 
• The automotive sensor is exposed to some fluid motion but overall less. 
• Aircraft fuel can remain quite stable - however turbulence will creates concentrated fluid motion.
• This motion wears the resistive trace - so inadequate resolution of the variable resistor is now faced with increased wear.  From bad to worse.

• The basic requirements 
• Standard aircraft fuel gauges are calibrated only for the full and empty position.
• Caveat - new automotive systems are calibrated to the tank - great improvement
• Caveat - new aircraft MFD's allow tank calibration - Aerospace Logic, JPI, Garmin

• Almost daily use  
• The automotive sensor is continually washed with new solvent at every filling and fuel fills are more frequent. 
• Aircraft fuel can remain in the tank for long periods - it is designed to do so - however impurity buildup on the variable resistor are common at a fraction of usage time of the automotive application.
•  it is quite common to have your aircraft senders ultrasonically cleaned

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Propane Level Gauge

New requirements for intrinsic safety for all aviation fuel level systems 

• The general aircraft industry found that they could utilize a commercial off the shelf, patented float sending unit from the propane industry
• This met the new safety requirements and directly replace a float level legacy system.

• A Non- Contact solution - the resistance card was removed from the tank environment.
• Shock inputs from turbulent air can however de-couple the matched magnetic drive and the the gauge will take a set but in-accurate reading or drift back to the correct reading.
• Suffice to say - Propane Tanks were not meant to fly

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Aircraft Capacitive Sender Ad - 1948

Alternatives  - 

Capacitive Senders -

Conceived in the Late 1940's this aircraft fuel sending system set about to address the two most common issues presented above - fluid motion and resolution of the larger fuel quantity.   

These are the most widely used in aircraft above 12,500 lb 

Capacitive Sensor Benefits 

• Immunity from fluid motion 
• Greater resolution of the large fuel volume 
• Shapable to the fluid volume - tailored to the tank volume.

Capacitive Sensor Issues

• Difficult to Prove Intrinsic Safety
• The definition of the sensor is to utilize two metallic or conductive elements in the tank 
• The intrinsic safety requirement must be met with increasing the complexity of the system.
• It is a spark in the capacitive sensor that initiated the explosion in TWA 800 fuel tank. 

• Moisture Rejection
• An aircraft fuel tank breathes on ascending and descending - moisture in the air is constantly brought in contact with the fuel.  Sealing the tank is not an option.
• As the capacitive utilizes the fuel contents as an integral element of the level reading - this variable is very difficult to manage.

• What's in the tank - matters a great deal 
• Fuel must be:
• uniform 
• moisture-free
• stable and uniform temperature
• contaminant free
•  to give a consistent and accurate fuel level indication 

When you review the system above - the capacitive sender solved several issues with fuel level indication, however it brought a few of it's own limitations along for the ride.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ideal Aircraft Solution Characteristics

• Non Contact - New FAA Requirement
• Intrinsically Safe - 
• The alternative is proven safe electronics in the fuel
• Immune to fuel contamination

• Unaffected by Fluid motion 
• No wear items related to fuel level reporting

• High Resolution 
• Address the larger quantity of fuel in aviation systems.

• Simplicity 
• The best aviation solutions eschew complexity where a simple system provides equivalent benefit.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CIES Inc AMR Fuel Level 

Float Based Level Sensing - Retrofits or directly replaces most units in the field

• Non Contact 
• No - Safety Issues 
• No - Fluid Contamination
• No - No moisture or fuel quality issues

• Immune to Fluid motion
• No wear of fuel level reporting system

• Resolution 
• Digital output
• More fuel level information 
• Integrity of the level signal
• Interfaces to modern avionic solutions
• Ability to output fuel temperature - Lbs fuel. 

• Simplicity




• No complexity required
• On the platforms we have been applied - exceed it's requirements

CIES Inc AMR  A sensor that was designed for and patented with the aviation industry in mind, but suitable for all high value applications.

How Can a Float Based Sender be so Accurate

Accuracy in Fuel Level Sensing 

Absent the aircraft substantiation that is protected intellectual property at the present time,  it is hard to demonstrate what this system does for the average pilot.  

This fuel system component will generate considerable interest, but fuel level senders of the past have been, an ineffective tool for pilots to utilize.

We can all point to or tell stories of classic flying films where the lead has - tapped the fuel gauge to see if it was reporting correctly.

A technological advancement in this field may not just improve an existing fuel quantity indication system  - but may become a new component with the potential to be disruptive to aviation safety. 

Why? 

In earlier dialogs we discussed the digital aspect of the fuel level sensor output - but what does that mean.

In the diagram above illustrates a distinct position output of the float arm as represented as a ray on the hemisphere.

The middle point being represented by the binary 10000000  - the next ray above is 01111111 the next ray above by the binary 01111110.   Each of these is different.

What this provides is a positive address for the float position for every ray shown on the diagram.

By combining a digital address to a non contact level system.  We allow free motion of the float - no discernible wear - no wear that would affect this digital output.

A measuring system with many discrete addresses over the rise and fall of the float makes it is easier to carefully describe the tank volume into usable information for the pilot.

More information allows complex tank shapes and configurations commonly found in aircraft to be described in more controlled and accurate manner.

The non-contact part of the sensor takes the fuel contents of the tank and it's varying electrical and physical properties out of the equation.  

The controlled float finds the fuel / air boundary in all flight conditions.

Legacy Systems 

Resistive Systems 

So lets compare to a resistive based float system with the resistance trace in the tank  - most general aviation aircraft in the field use this or some variation.

So the manufacturer of the fuel sender will talk about how this resistor card is laser trimmed and it has 50 or 60 precision resistive steps from empty to full when the unit is brand new.  

So that appears to be similar to the example above - yes the digital example has more steps but it is more expensive - yes.  

What is not revealed  is that the resistive steps in output are not distinct or different  - but rather a subtle step increase or decrease in the electrical property when new - after use or wear the subtleties are easily blurred or worn away.  So we in actual practice have a system that now may incur discontinuities in the stepwise output - and provide a less than adequate reading or even deceptive reading for fuel level .   

When we talk about modern general aviation aircraft and the resistance traces become much smaller as shown on the right.   The need for intrinsic safety - explosion proof requirement brought about some subtle changes in aviation fuel systems.  It was no longer acceptable to have wires or traces in the fuel tank proper.  The general aviation industry turned to propane gauges that had the wiper driven by a magnetic couple to an external wiper system enclosed in plastic.


Capacitive Systems

Capacitive Systems - this is the domain of larger aircraft and some small aircraft.  It is the defacto system for aviation.  The designs have no moving parts and are reliable in principle.

Again we are not dealing with distinct positions but an electrical subtlety between one level and another.  So while the fluid provides a good dielectric - the qualities of the fuel become a critical component in how the system works.  Therefore what you add to the tank is a measurable component for the fuel gauge system and is known as the k factor in a capacitance equation.

So what you add - Fuel -  Quality, Temperature, Composition, Entrained Air, Water and Temperature  have a direct bearing on the output of the gauge.

Components of a good Capacitive level systems contain the following:

• Probe Compensators - measure permittivity of the fuel  - ability to carry a charge
• Densitometers  to determine the specific gravity of the fuel
• Temperature compensation - direct though linear effect on k 
• Compensation of tube diameters to provide a linearized output

If your capacitive level system does not have compensation,  it has limited value in aircraft applications. 

Capacitance probes while highly developed and may utilize segregated DC or AC power, can meet requirements for intrinsic safety.   Capacitive systems however will never overcome the fact that we have separated metal tubes connected to external wiring in the aircraft.

Capacitive systems have difficulty with

• Fuel Stratfication - hot fuel added over cold soaked fuel 
• Contamination
• Corrosion 
• Indifferent fuel quality or in non aviation applications alcohol percentages

Capacitance systems in transport aircraft are redundent in that there are two systems for each tank to insure dispatch reliability for transport aircraft.  

Why Don't They Just Fix It

What is the Aviation Market for Fuel Level Sensing Technology

• Fuel Level Sensing is a very large market for other vehicle types or stationary fuel storage, aviation is a minuscule percentage of sales.

• The following companies are big players in these markets and are protective of their market share:

• Textron Kautex      -TI Group
• Wallbro                  - Robert Bosch
• Hyundai Mobis      - Delphi
• VDO                      - Toyota
• Bourns                    - Methode  
• Rochester Gauge    - Wema, Isspro, S-W

• Most of these companies are not interested in or will actively avoid the aviation market 
• Business interest to license is minimal and no interest in government controlled production
• Exposure to litigation  

• Fuel Level Sensor industry is protective of its Intellectual Property. 

• Hotly Contested Territory (It has been termed a patent minefield) 
• A thorough  patent search is required, prior to initiating a design process.
• Interest in sharing and licensing intellectual property is limited at best.

• Fuel Level Sensing in aircraft needs to be "Intrisically Safe".

• Explosion Proof 
• Limited Spark or Heat energy in the fuel tank
• TWA 800 Disaster brought about changes in FAA policy / regs.
• SFAR 88 - Wire separation from fuel system.
• Electronic Wiring Inspection System - EWIS.  

• Fuel Level Sensing in aircraft is complex. 
• Fuel can contain dissolved air - ie. Jet A 14% by volume 
• This will outgas like soda at altitude.
• This will influence simple capacitive level systems
• Aviation fuel will contain water
• The changes in altitude due to descent will suck ambient air into the fuel tank, that air will contain water vapor that will condense and mix with the fuel. 
• This will  influence simple capacitive level systems
• Aviation fuel will support biological growth and water in fuel will initiate corrosion
• Metallic or resistive components in the tank will be adversely effected and fuel level output in turn will be adversely effected.
• Fuel in aircraft is more dynamic.
• A vehicle with three dimensions of motion allows for a very dynamic fuel environment. 
• This movement will wear away resistance senders of all types and require mechanical complexities to capacitive sensors to stabilize the local fuel level.
• Replacements to 100 LL Avgas may not be so friendly to existing resistance senders in the fuel tank.

• Non-Contact Fuel Level Sensing, which meets the requirement for "Intrinsically Safe" is actively pursued and "IP" accumulated in the Fuel Sender Industry for functional and business reasons.

• Current best sensor system for Multi-Fuel vehicles
• Best sensor system for 100% alcohol fueled vehicles 
• Solves issues with partial alcohol content - corrosion
• Solves issues with de-sulfered diesel 
• Required for LNG -  LPG
• Future vehicle systems with long term fuel storage i.e.. Chevrolet Volt

• Aviation specific fuel system suppliers are not actively interested in the Non-Commercial, Non-Business aircraft application of their products or product lines.

So designing, building and certifying an aviation specific fuel level sender for aircraft under 12,500 lb is like most things in aviation. difficult, challenging and more involved than a cursory examination suggests.   It was however, not impossible.

Aviation Float Fuel Sender - Historical Perspective

Dawn of Aircraft Instrumentation

The initial non-electrical float system was used on various aircraft, the most famous being the Piper J-3 "Cub." which used a cork with a wire imbedded in it that extended into the view of the pilot. Lots of wire showing, lots of gas; no wire showing, no gas.  Equally glass sight gauges are used in high wing aircraft and high wing fuel can to flow to the engine by means of gravity.

Electrical Aircraft Instrumentation Comes of Age

With the addition of electrical systems in aircraft the float was connected to the arm of a variable resistor whose electrical leads are brought through the wall of the tank and connected to the fuel quantity gauge and to the ship's electrical bus. 

Thus, the change in resistance as the float follows the level of the fuel.  This electrical value causes the needle on the fuel quantity gauge to deflect indicating the quantity of fuel in the tank.  Simple and direct.

For odd shaped tanks, particularly a flat tank in a wing with dihedral, multiple resistance floats are connected in series to correctly categorize this onger sloped tank.

This is the fuel gauging system on most, if not all, automobiles, the majority of piston engine aircraft, and some turbine aircraft. This system has been given very poor reviews over the years, some of which is deserved, but a large portion of the criticism is not.

If the resistance float is poorly designed and constructed, if the gauge is poorly designed and constructed, if the gauge is poorly marked, if the damping of the complete system is not suitable for aircraft or it's particular use,  or if the system is poorly installed and calibrated,  criticism for poor operation is rightly deserved. 

Digital Display and Interface  

In the instance of fuel level - Nothing really 

Well in the case of Commercial Aircraft the capacitance value was converted to ARINC 429 protocol and transmitted to the cockpit.

Until Now 

The First Digital Output General Aviation Fuel Level Sender